Website audit & concept · prepared by Web Express

Cheadle Skip Hire

A technical read of cheadleskips.com, what it is quietly costing them, and a two-screen concept built from their own live prices and booking system.

Audited 16 August 2026 Every figure measured live, not estimated Private link — please don't share on

See the concept first if you like. Two working screens, using their real prices and their real booking system.

1Read this before you pitch

This is a very different situation from a typical small-business website, and getting the framing right is most of the job.

Start here — they are ahead of their competition

Cheadle Skip Hire already has online booking with card payment, prices published openly, a paperless operation with automatic waste transfer notes, and real-time driver updates. Most skip firms in Greater Manchester still make you ring for a quote. Do not tell them their website is bad. They have already bought the expensive part.

The pitch is that the good stuff is being smothered. A customer on a phone has to pull down 24 MB before they see anything, then meets a booking form squeezed into a fixed 502-pixel box — and the company has no working analytics to see how many give up.

£120
Cheapest skip, published
5
Step online checkout
24.4 MB
Homepage weight
0
Working analytics

Who you are dealing with

The thing that could sink the quote

The booking and payment engine is not theirs — it is a WasteLogics subdomain (cheadleskips.myyard.co.uk) dropped into the page as an iframe. Any new website has to keep that working. Before quoting, find out what WasteLogics costs them, whether it offers a proper responsive embed or an API, and whether they are locked into a contract.

2The 24 MB homepage

This is the headline finding and it is not a rounding error.

MetricResult
Total homepage weight24.4 MB
Of which images21.1 MB
Time to first visible content5.4 s
Images using lazy loading0 of 9
Requests35
Server protocolHTTP/1.1 (no HTTP/2)

Three photographs alone account for 16.1 MB:

FileDownloadedActual sizeDisplayed at
MG_2263.jpg5.8 MB1280 × 853208 px wide
MG_2274.jpg5.4 MB1280 × 853208 px wide
MG_2243.jpg4.9 MB1280 × 853208 px wide
Homenew2.jpg2.0 MBbackgroundCSS background
4 "why choose us" PNGs4.1 MB960 × 960 each247 px wide

Those three skip photos are being downloaded at nearly 6 MB each to be displayed at the size of a business card.

95.8%
We downloaded their five heaviest images and re-encoded them at the size they are actually shown. 19.11 MB became 814 KB — visually identical on screen. No redesign, no new photography, no CMS change. Just correctly sized files. Those same compressed images are the ones used in the concept mockup, so you can see for yourself that nothing looks worse.

Why this matters commercially, in their words not ours: skip hire is an urgent, local, overwhelmingly mobile search. Somebody standing in a half-cleared garage on 4G is not waiting 24 MB. They are tapping the next result.

3The booking system — they did the hard part

The /hire/ page contains a genuinely good five-step checkout: postcode → price and availability → delivery and billing address → preview and confirm → pay. It handles company name, contact details, delivery and collection dates with AM/PM slots, "how did you hear about us", and order notes. It takes card payment. This is real infrastructure and it works.

Then it is embedded like this:

AttributeSet toConsequence
HeightFixed 502 pxLonger steps have nowhere to go
ScrollingDisabled (scrolling="no")The visitor cannot scroll within the frame
Position on mobileStarts 372 px down46% of a phone screen is used before the form appears
Mobile header242 px tallPlus a 100 px empty gap below it

Step one — a single postcode box — fits fine. The risk is steps three to five, where the form asks for company name, full name, telephone, email, two dates and order notes. That is a lot of form for a 502-pixel window with scrolling switched off.

Say it this way

"You've spent real money on a proper online checkout, and then put it in a 502-pixel box that can't scroll, halfway down a phone screen. The booking system isn't the problem. The window you're looking at it through is."

Found while building the concept — ask about this early

WasteLogics serves this header on the booking page:

Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' cheadleskips.com www.cheadleskips.com

In plain terms: their booking system will only load inside a page served from cheadleskips.com. Any other domain is blocked outright by the browser — we hit exactly this while building the concept, which is why the booking page here shows a static reproduction rather than the live widget.

Why it matters to the quote: a rebuild normally gets tested on a staging domain first. That will not work until WasteLogics adds the staging domain to that allowlist — which is a support ticket with a third party, on their timetable, not yours. Confirm they will do it before committing to a delivery date.

There is also a tracking consequence, and it is the expensive one. Because checkout lives in an iframe on a third-party domain, the URL never changes as the customer moves through the five steps. Nothing can see where people drop off, and no advertising platform can be told what a completed booking looks like. Which leads directly to the next point.

4They cannot measure any of it

Verified in the page source

The site loads google-analytics.com/analytics.js. That is Universal Analytics, which stopped processing new data in July 2023. There is no GA4 tag, no gtag, no dataLayer, and no Meta Pixel anywhere on the site.

In plain terms: for roughly three years, nobody has been able to see how many people visit, which pages they land on, which areas they come from, or how many start a booking and give up. The analytics code is still sitting there looking reassuring in the source, and collecting nothing.

This is also why nobody has noticed the 24 MB homepage. There is no data showing the bounce.

5SEO and trust gaps

Missing basics

What's already right

Trust gap worth fixing this week

The footer of every page reads: "Waste Carriers: Site Permit   ISO 9001:   ISO 14001:   Construction Line Gold:"with every single number left blank. For a waste company, the waste carrier registration number is exactly what a cautious commercial customer looks for. They are claiming four credentials and evidencing none of them. Ask them for the numbers; it is a ten-minute fix and it makes them look more legitimate than every competitor who never mentions it.

Worth a question, not an accusation

There is a WordPress plugin installed called site-helper-3f49dae5189c, loading 510 KB of JavaScript. The random hash in the folder name is unusual for a normal plugin. It may well be something their host installed legitimately, but it is worth asking who put it there. Their Google Maps API key is also exposed in the page source — that is normal for the Maps JavaScript API, but it should be domain-restricted in the Google Cloud console. Worth confirming it is.

6Mobile

7What their accounts say about pricing

From the filed accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 — public information at Companies House, filed under the small companies regime. No profit and loss account was filed, so the figures below are from the balance sheet.

 20252024Change
Tangible fixed assets (fleet, plant)£2,466,737£2,190,114+£276,623
Cash at bank and in hand£176,627£74,625more than doubled
Debtors£166,440£206,610−£40,170
Retained profit reserve£1,153,346£866,409+£286,937
Net assets£1,153,446£866,509+33%
What this means for your price

Retained profit grew by £286,937 in one year. Cash more than doubled. They are carrying £2.47 M of fleet and took on more hire purchase to expand it (£947,922 of finance lease obligations, up from £787,145). Debtors fell while cash rose, which means they are collecting well.

This is a profitable, growing, asset-heavy business that reinvests. A £400–£800 monthly retainer is a rounding error against a quarter of a million pounds of annual retained profit. Do not pitch this like a small local trader. Do not go in cheap.

One caveat to keep you honest: because no P&L was filed, £286,937 is the movement in reserves, not stated profit. If dividends were paid, actual profit was higher still. Either way the direction is unambiguous.

8What to sell them, and for how much

Because they already own the hard infrastructure, there is a genuinely attractive first job here: a small, fast, obviously-worth-it fix that buys trust before anyone talks about a rebuild.

StageDeliverablePrice
0Written audit + concept mockupFree — door opener
1Speed & measurement sprint — compress and lazy-load every image, fix the booking frame, install GA4 + Meta Pixel, add the missing H1 and meta descriptions, fill in the credential numbers£750
2New website, keeping the WasteLogics booking engine£3,450
3aCare — hosting, WordPress updates, backups, content changes£150/mo
3bGrowth ⭐ — the above + local SEO across the area pages, Google Business, review engine, monthly report£450/mo
3cMachine — the above + Google Ads and Meta managed, with real conversion tracking£850/mo
4WhatsApp enquiry line with automated replies£600 + £90/mo
4Trade account portal (repeat customers reorder in one tap)£1,200
The £750 sprint is the whole strategy

It is small enough to say yes to without a meeting, it fixes things you can prove with before-and-after numbers, and once GA4 is running you own the only source of truth about their website. Every conversation after that starts with your data. That is how the £450/month gets signed.

For reference, UK agencies typically charge £3,000–£8,000 for a build of this type and £150–£600/month for ongoing work. These numbers sit inside that range deliberately — competitive, not cheap. Given what the accounts show, going in low would be a mistake.

9The order to do it in

#Do thisWhy in this order
1Open by complimenting the booking system. Genuinely.They invested in it and they are proud of it. Leading with criticism of a website they know is dated puts them on the defensive; leading with "you're ahead of your competitors on the thing that matters" makes them listen to the rest.
2Show the 24 MB number and the 95.8% image test.It is a single, undeniable, non-technical fact with a fix attached. Nobody argues with "6 MB photo shown at 208 pixels".
3Tell them their analytics has been dead since 2023.This is the moment the conversation changes. Most owners assume someone is watching the numbers. Finding out nobody has for three years creates urgency that no design argument ever will.
4Ask the three questions.
What does WasteLogics cost and are you tied in? Will WasteLogics allowlist a staging domain? Who maintains the WordPress site now?
The first two decide whether a rebuild is even deliverable — the frame-ancestors lock means nothing can be tested off their live domain until WasteLogics agrees. The third tells you who you are displacing and whether there is an incumbent to handle diplomatically.
5Sell the £750 sprint, not the rebuild.Small, fast, provable. It gets you inside, gets GA4 installed, and gives you three months of real data before anyone has to decide on a £3,450 build.
6Come back with the data and quote the retainer.By then you are not selling an opinion, you are reading them their own numbers. That is a much easier conversation.
The one-line pitch

"You've got proper online booking, published prices and thirty years of reputation — and your homepage makes people download 24 megabytes to find it, on a site that hasn't recorded a single visitor since 2023."

10About the concept

Everything in it is real. The prices, skip sizes, bin-bag equivalents, reviews, address, company number and VAT number were all taken from their own website on 16 August 2026. The reviews are quoted word for word. Nothing was invented.

Two points worth making when you show it:

Measured side by side on a 375 × 812 phone, ignoring the yellow mockup banner:

 Live siteConcept
Booking frame height502 px, fixed666 px, sized to the screen
Scrolling inside the frameDisabledEnabled
Screen used before the form appears46%36%
Steps visible before you startNoYes, all five

What else the two screens demonstrate:

Have a look. Both screens work on phone and desktop.


Prepared by Web Express, 16 August 2026. This is an independent technical assessment of a publicly accessible website, alongside figures from accounts filed publicly at Companies House. It is not legal, financial or investment advice. Cheadle Skip Hire Ltd, WasteLogics, MyYard and Trustindex are named for identification only and have no involvement in this document.